SHIMEK

v.

FLORIDA

Citator

Cited By

• Roberts v. State, 970 So. 2d 480 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007)
  …ndly, the claim is without merit. A trial court has broad discretion in deciding whether to have testimony re-read to the jury. See State v. Riechmann, 777 So. 2d 342, 365 (Fla.2000); Coleman v. State, 610 So. 2d 1283, 1286 (Fla.1992), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 921, 114 S.Ct. 321, 126 L.Ed.2d 267 (1993); Roper v. State, 608 So. 2d 533, 535 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992). Here, it is clear that the trial court considered the request of the juror and made a reasoned decision not to have the testimony re-read. We find no ab…
• Profilet v. Cambridge Fin. Corp., 231 B.R. 373 (S.D. Fla. 1999)