TIMES PUBLISHING CO. ET AL.

v.

RUSSELL

Citator

Cited By

• Duke H. Scott, M.D. v. Nelson, 697 So. 2d 207 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997)
  …t restrictive means to accomplish its purpose. In the initial closure determina [*209] tion, the burden of proof is on the party seeking closure. Id. at 119. Subsequently, in Times Publishing Company v. Russell, 615 So. 2d 158 (Fla.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 943, 114 S.Ct. 381, 126 L.Ed.2d 330 (1993), the court explained that the standard applicable to an initial closure request is different from the standard applicable to a request to open records that have already been closed by a court. The court held th…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Carnegie v. Tedder, 698 So. 2d 1310 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997)
  …We recognize that Lewis does state that the news media must be given notice and an opportunity to be heard on the question of closure prior to a court’s decision. However, in Times Publishing Co. v. Russell, 615 So. 2d 158, 158 (Fla.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 943, 114 S.Ct. 381, 126 L.Ed.2d 330 (1993), the Florida Supreme Court stated that the Lewis decision was limited to establishing a three-prong test for determining whether the trial court was justified in closing a “criminal” proceeding. Because this ca…
• Stansbury v. California, 511 U.S. 318 (U.S. 1994)
  …before he mentioned the turquoise car,” and thus approved the trial court’s ruling that Miranda v. Arizona did not bar the admission of statements Stansbury made before that point. 4 Cal. 4th, at 1054, 846 P. 2d, at 777-778. We granted certiorari. 510 U. S. 943 (1993). II We held in Miranda that a person questioned by law enforcement officers after being “taken into custody or otherwise deprived of his freedom of action in any significant way” must first “be warned that he has a right to remain silent, t…