FRAZIER

v.

TEXAS

Citator

Cited By

• Kimel v. State OF Fla. Bd. OF Regents, 139 F.3d 1426 (11th Cir. 1998)
  …h abrogation, we hold Reich is no longer good law.’’); Hale v. Arizona, 993 F. 2d 1387, 1391 (9th Cir.) (era banc ) (stating that Congress clearly intended to abrogate the states' sovereign immunity in the 1974 amendments to the FLSA), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 946, 114 S.Ct. 386, 126 L.Ed.2d 335 (1993). . I must emphasize, however, that I do not conclude, or imply, that Congress is required to use any “magic words” to express effectively its intent to abrogate the states' immunity. I conclude only that Congre…
• Gambetta v. Prison Rehabilitative Indus. & Diversified Enters., Inc., 112 F.3d 1119 (11th Cir. 1997)
  …38, 126 L.Ed.2d 192 (1993); the Eighth Circuit in McMaster v. Minnesota, 30 F. 3d 976 (8th Cir.1994), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 1116, 130 L.Ed.2d 1080 (1995); and the Ninth Circuit in Hale v. Arizona, 993 F. 2d 1387 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 946, 114 S.Ct. 386, 126 L.Ed.2d 335 (1993). In each case, state prison inmates sought to be paid federal minimum wage for their labor in state prison industries. Each of the three courts of appeals rejected the inmates’ claims on the basis that they w…