THOMAS

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Norbert Schlei, 122 F.3d 944 (11th Cir. 1997)
  …can satisfy this requirement by showing that the jury was unable to sift through the evidence and “make an individualized determination as to each defendant.” United States v. Saget, 991 F. 2d 702, 707 (11th Cir.) (citation omitted), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 950, 114 S.Ct. 396, 126 L.Ed.2d 344 (1993). It is the district court’s duty to “balance the prejudice that a defendant may suffer from a joint trial, against the public’s interest in judicial economy and efficiency.” United States v. Cross, 928 F. 2d…
• United States v. Brenson, 104 F.3d 1267 (11th Cir. 1997)
  …83). “When a jury finds a defendant guilty, its verdict must stand if ‘any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.’ ” United States v. Saget, 991 F. 2d 702, 711 (11th Cir.) cert. denied, 510 U.S. 950, 114 S.Ct. 396, 126 L.Ed.2d 344 (1993) (quoting Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 319, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 2789, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)) (emphasis in original). However, “if a reasonable jury must necessarily entertain a reasonable doubt as to the defen…

  ← 1 / 3 →
• Hill v. Schofield, 608 F.3d 1272 (11th Cir. 2010)
  …Georgia state prison inmate. His conviction and sentence were affirmed on direct appeal by the Georgia Supreme Court in 1993, Hill v. State, 263 Ga. 37, 427 S.E. 2d 770 (1993), and the United States Supreme Court denied certiorari, Hill v. Georgia, 510 U.S. 950, 114 S.Ct. 396, 126 L.Ed.2d 344, rehrg. denied, Hill v. Georgia, 510 U.S. 1066, 114 S.Ct. 745, 126 L.Ed.2d 708 (1994). Hill commenced state court habeas proceedings in 1994, during the course of which he raised a claim that he was exempt from exec…