MEDVIK

v.

CITY OF UNIVERSITY CITY ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Hill v. State, 688 So. 2d 901 (Fla. 1996)
  …e, the defendants were precluded as,a matter of law from asserting necessity or justification as a defense to trespass violations committed in protest of abortion. For example, in City of Wichita v. Tilson, 253 Kan. 285, 855 P. 2d 911, cert. denied, 510 U.S. 976, 114 S.Ct. 468, 126 L.Ed.2d 420 (1993), one of the more recent cases on the subject, the Kansas Supreme Court opined: Regardless of what name is attached to the defense (and for the sake of simplicity we will refer to it as the necessity defense) o…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Thompson v. Nagle, 118 F.3d 1442 (11th Cir. 1997)
  …Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed. Thompson v. State, 615 So. 2d 129 (Ala.Crim.App.1992). The Alabama Supreme Court denied certiorari, Thompson v. State, No. 1920696 (March 19, 1993), as did the United States Supreme Court. Thompson v. Alabama, 510 U.S. 976, 114 S.Ct. 467, 126 L.Ed.2d 418 (1993). Thompson then filed the present habeas corpus petition in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama. A magistrate judge entered a 74-page report and recommendation that the distric…