O'MELVENY & MYERS

v.

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, AS RECEIVER FOR AMERICAN DIVERSIFIED SAVINGS BANK, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Dolan v. City of Tigard, 512 U.S. 374 (U.S. 1994)
  …ad an essential nexus to the development of the proposed site. Id., at 121, 854 P. 2d, at 443. Therefore, the court found the conditions to be reasonably related to the impact of the expansion of petitioner’s business. Ibid. We granted certiorari, 510 U. S. 989 (1993), because of an alleged conflict between the Oregon Supreme Court’s decision and our decision in Nollan, supra. II The Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution, made applicable to the States through the Fourtee…
• McFARLAND v. Scott, 512 U.S. 849 (U.S. 1994)
  …ns, No. 4:93-CV-723-A (WD Tex., Oct. 26, 1993). On October 27, 1993, this Court granted a stay of execution in McFarland’s original suit pending consideration of [*854] his petition for certiorari. 510 U. S. 938. The Court later granted certiorari, 510 U. S. 989 (1993), to resolve an apparent conflict with Brown v. Vasquez, 952 F. 2d 1164 (CA9 1991). II A Section 848(q)(4)(B) of Title 21 provides: “In any post conviction proceeding under section 2254 or 2255 of title 28 seeking to vacate or set aside a…
• Mci Telecomms. Corp. v. Am. Tel. & Tel. Co., 512 U.S. 218 (U.S. 1994)
  …ization of permissive detariffing violates Section 203(a) of the Communications Act.” App. to Pet. for Cert. 2a. Both MCI and the United States (together with the Commission) petitioned for certiorari. We granted the petitions and consolidated them. 510 U. S. 989 (1993). [*224] II Section 203 of the Communications Act contains both the filed rate provisions of the Act and the Commission’s disputed modification authority. It provides in relevant part: “(a) Filing; public display. “Every common carrier, exc…