TURNER
v.
ILLINOIS
TURNER
ILLINOIS
510 U.S. 1013
Supreme Court of the United States (1993)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Paradies, 98 F.3d 1266 (11th Cir. 1996)…ly, the government argues that, even in jurisdictions that require a quid pro quo, jury instructions that merely track the language of the statute is not error. The court in United States v. Medley, 913 F. 2d 1248, 1260 (7th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1013, 114 S.Ct. 604, 126 L.Ed.2d 569 (1993), stated that "[tjhe essential element of a § 666 violation is a `quid pro quo[.]'" The court opined, however, that the defendant did not object to the jury instructions given in the district court, which instru…