STERLING SUFFOLK RACECOURSE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

v.

BURRILLVILLE RACING ASSN., INC.

Citator

Cited By

• Waters v. Churchill, 511 U.S. 661 (U.S. 1994)
  …shing between protected and unprotected speech, see, e. g., Miller v. California, 413 U. S. 15, 22 (1973), and in determining whether speech pertains to a matter of public concern, compare O’Connor v. Steeves, 994 F. 2d 905, 915 (CA1), cert, denied, 510 U. S. 1024 (1993), with Gillum v. City of Kerrville, 3 F. 3d 117, 120-121 (CA5 1993), cert. denied, 510 U. S. 1072 (1994), Justice O’Connor creates yet another speech-related puzzlement that government employers, judges, and juries must struggle to solve. The…
• Rooney v. Watson, 101 F.3d 1378 (11th Cir. 1996)
  …e district court correctly pointed out, an inquiry into a governmental entity’s custom or policy is relevant only when a constitutional deprivation has occurred. See Vineyard v. County of Murray, Ga., 990 F. 2d 1207, 1211 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1024, 114 S.Ct. 636, 126 L.Ed.2d 594 (1993). Since we have determined that Deputy Watson’s conduct did not cause the Rooneys to suffer a constitutional deprivation, we need not inquire into Volusia County’s policy and custom relating to patrol vehicle o…
• Kenrick Christopher v. State, 449 F.3d 1360 (11th Cir. 2006)
  …case when the statements of an attorney during a trial will be so prejudicial “as to impair gravely the calm and dispassionate consideration of the ease by the jury.” Vineyard v. County of Murray, Ga., 990 F. 2d 1207, 1213 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1024, 114 S.Ct. 636, 126 L.Ed.2d 594 (1993). I do not believe this to be such a case. Furthermore, Rule 61 provides that no error in anything done or omitted by the court during trial is ground for granting a new trial or for setting aside a verdict unl…