KEOUGH, ACTING REGIONAL ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, REGION I

v.

AMERICAN POLICYHOLDERS INSURANCE CO.

Citator

Cited By

• Brown v. Payton, 544 U.S. 133 (U.S. 2005)
  …t Payton’s jury believed it was required to disregard his mitigating evidence. 3 Cal. 4th, at 1070-1071, 839 P. 2d, at 1048. Payton sought review of the California Supreme Court’s decision here. We declined to grant certiorari. Payton v. California, 510 U. S. 1040 (1994). Payton filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, reiterating that the jury was prevented from considering his mitigation evidence. The District Court held that t…
• United States v. Noriega, 117 F.3d 1206 (11th Cir. 1997)
  …ls these rulings. This court will not overturn a district court’s denial of a motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence absent an abuse of discretion. See United States v. Swindall, 971 F. 2d 1531, 1555 (11th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1040, 114 S.Ct. 683, 126 L.Ed.2d 650 (1994). The district court’s underlying determinations regarding prosecutorial misconduct' involve mixed questions of law and fact, and therefore, are subject to de- novo review. See generally Hays v. Alabama, 85 F.…
• Wilson v. State BAR OF Ga., 132 F.3d 1422 (11th Cir. 1998)
  …davit or other evidence specific facts which for the purpose of summary judgment will be taken as true.” Region 8 Forest Serv. Timber Purchasers Council v. Alcock, 993 F. 2d 800, 806 (11th Cir.1993) (internal quotation marks omitted), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1040, 114 S.Ct. 683, 126 L.Ed.2d 651 (1994). In this context, we evaluate standing “from all materials of record.” E.F. Hutton & Co. v. Hadley, 901 F. 2d 979, 983 (11th Cir.1990) (internal quotation marks omitted). “Whether a statute, regulation, or loc…