THE MACCABEES, ETC., APPELLANT,
v.
ABE WILENSKY, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1970-03-03
No. 69-921
Before PEARSON, C. J., and HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.
232 So. 2d 222 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1970) Positive Treatment
Cited by 5 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The record on appeal, briefs and argument of counsel having been considered and it appearing therefrom that no reversible error has been demonstrated, the orders appealed herein are affirmed. See § 624.-0221, Fla.Stat, F.S.A.; Winky’s, Inc. v. Francis, Fla.App.1969, 229 So.2d 903.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Carola D. Allen v. In re The Est. of Ellen C. Dutton, 394 So. 2d 132 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980)
    …participation of the procurer in the planning and drafting of the will; and (3) the realization by the procurer of a substantial benefit under the provisions of the will. In Re Estate of Carpenter, 253 So. 2d 697 (Fla. 1971); In Re Estate of Nelson, 232 So. 2d 222 (Fla. 1st DCA 1970). Gurney clearly had a fiduciary or confidential relationship with Ellen, and he was shown to have participated in making substantive decisions concerning the disposition of her estate. Appellees urge, however, that he was not a…
    1 / 3
  • Rand v. Giller, 489 So. 2d 796 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986)
    …re, a presumption of undue influence does not arise. Zinnser v. Gregory, 77 So. 2d 611, 613-14 (Fla.1955); Allen v. Estate of Dutton, 394 So. 2d 132, 134 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980), review denied, 402 So. 2d 609 (Fla.1981).7 Compare In re Estate of Nelson, 232 So. 2d 222 (Fla. 1st DCA) (where drafting attorneys who were named executors and trustees had broad discretion over administration of the trust, they were deemed beneficiaries for purposes of determining whether a presumption of undue influence arose), cert. d…
  • In re Est. of Lillian B. Whitehead, 248 So. 2d 186 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971)
    …County Judge’s findings of ultimate fact and that he did not misconceive controlling principles of law, we must affirm. In re Estate of Balch, Fla.App.1968, 215 So. 2d 343 (cert. den. Fla.1969, 225 So. 2d 525); In re Estate of Nelson, Fla.App.1970, 232 So. 2d 222, 224. We have not overlooked the other points raised by the appellants, but do not consider that they have merit or require discussion. The order on appeal is affirmed. Affirmed. REED and OWEN, JJ., concur. WALDEN, J., dissents, with opinion.…

Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw