CABAL
v.
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE ET AL.; TURNPAUGH V. MICHIGAN, IN RE HENTHORN; WILLIS V. CITY OF CLEVELAND; MARTIN V. MARYLAND; TRUSTEES OF THE WELFARE TRUST FUND, LOCAL UNION NO. 475, ET AL. V. DUNSTON, NEW JERSEY COMMISSIONER OF HEALTH, ET AL.; METCALF V. FELEC SERVICES ET AL.; CARTER ET AL. V. UNITED STATES ET AL.; WHITE V. KENTUCKY; SUSAN R. M., BY HER NEXT FRIEND, CHARLES L. M. V. NORTHEAST INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT ET AL.; TILSON V. CITY OF WICHITA, KANSAS; MARINO V. WRITERS' GUILD OF AMERICA ET AL.; WILLIAMS V. LEHIGH VALLEY CARPENTERS UNION ET AL.; SYRIANI V. NORTH CAROLINA; GILES V. THOMAS, WARDEN; WEST V. OKLAHOMA; STANLEY V. WHITE ET AL.; DAVIS V. GEORGIA; HILL V. GEORGIA; THOMAS V. UNITED STATES; RICHARDS V. MEDICAL CENTER OF DELAWARE INC. ET AL.; PARTEE V. GODINEZ, WARDEN; TRIESTMAN V. UNITED STATES; DAVIS V. COLLINS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION; HUMPHREY V. COLEMAN ET AL.; LIGHTBOURNE V. CHILES, GOVERNOR OF FLORIDA, ET AL.; PIPKINS V. STATE BAR OF NEVADA; SCHUSTER V. SOUTH DAKOTA; CARR V. CALIFORNIA; BAXTER V. ROSEMEYER, SUPERINTENDENT; STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION AT GREENSBURG, ET AL., IN RE MANFRED; REYNA V. TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION, ET AL.; COWTHRAN V. BROOKSHIRE GROCERY CO.; NORTH V. OKLAHOMA; HYDER V. COLLINS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION; LEWIS V. MORRIS, WARDEN, ET AL., IN RE BROOKS ET AL.; SLOAN V. JONES ET AL.; JOHNSON V. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA; SPINDLE V. BERRONG, WARDEN; HENRY V. GULFPORT PAPER CO., INC.; HUGHEY V. HAMPTON, WARDEN, ET AL., IN RE BOTELLO, IN RE NEWTOP; BARTLETT V. DOMOVICH, WARDEN, ET AL., IN RE PORZIO

U.S. | 1994-01-10
Nos. 92-8494; No. 92-8870; No. 92-8982; No. 92-9114; No. 92-9175; No. 93-210; No. 93-297; No. 93-303; No. 93-351; No. 93-434; No. 93-467; No. 93-509; No. 93-5063; No. 93-5077; No. 93-5101; No. 93-5276; No. 93-5628; No. 93-5700; No. 93-5753; No. 93-5783; No. 93-5846; No. 93-5911; No. 93-5954; No. 93-5957; No. 93-5967; No. 93-5988; No. 93-6002; No. 93-6005; No. 93-6023; No. 93-6024; No. 93-6033; No. 93-6034; No. 93-6038; No. 93-6089; No. 93-6090; No. 93-6106; No. 93-6114; No. 93-6117; No. 93-6133; No. 93-6136; No. 93-6151; No. 93-6173; No. 93-6184; No. 93-6291; No. 93-6346; No. 93-6430
510 U.S. 1065 Supreme Court of the United States (1994)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

This opinion is a Supreme Court order denying petitions for rehearing in thirty-three consolidated cases decided during the 1993 term, involving diverse legal matters including criminal justice, employment, administrative law, and civil rights. The Court's denial of rehearing affirmed its previous decisions in each case as reflected in the page references to earlier opinions in that term.


© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Opinion of the Court

ante, p. 831; ante, p. 975; ante, p. 809; ante, p. 851; ante, p. 855; ante, p. 944; ante, p. 931; No. 93-303. No. 93-351. No. 93-434. No. 93-467. No. 93-509. No. 93-5063. No. 93-5077. No. 93-5101. No. 93-5276. No. 93-5628. No. 93-5700. No. 93-5753. No. 93-5783. No. 93-5846. No. 93-5911. No. 93-5954. No. 93-5957. No. 93-5967. No. 93-5988. No. 93-6002. No. 93-6005. No. 93-6023. No. 93-6024. No. 93-6033. No. 93-6034. No. 93-6038. No. 93-6089. ante, p. 870; ante, p. 946; ante, p. 972; ante, p. 976; ante, p. 978; ante, p. 873; ante, p. 948; ante, p. 876; ante, p. 949; ante, p. 921; ante, p. 950; ante, p. 950; ante, p. 950; ante, p. 951; ante, p. 952; ante, p. 953; ante, p. 953; ante, p. 954; ante, p. 967; ante, p. 968; ante, p. 968; ante, p. 969; ante, p. 969; ante, p. 975; ante, p. 969; ante, p. 955; ante, p. 970; No. 93-6090. No. 93-6106. No. 93-6114. No. 93-6117. No. 93-6133. No. 93-6136. No. 93-6151. No. 93-6173. No. 93-6184. No. 93-6291. No. 93-6346. No. 93-6430. ante, p. 970; ante, p. 980; ante, p. 975; ante, p. 956; ante, p. 957; ante, p. 980; ante, p. 981; ante, p. 981; ante, p. 942; ante, p. 988; ante, p. 972; and ante, p. 975. Petitions for rehearing denied.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw