IZUMI SEIMITSU KOGYO KABUSHIKI KAISHA

v.

U. S. PHILIPS CORP. ET AL.; EICHELBERGER ET AL. V. BALETTE ET AL., IN RE CORDOVA-GONZALEZ, MOLINA DE HERNANDEZ V. ARIZONA; SWAIN V. ACCOUNTANTS ON CALL; SWAIN V. DECATUR FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN ASSN.; HENDERSON V. BANK OF NEW ENGLAND; WAHI V. HERMAN; MOATS V. REID ET AL.; JAAKKOLA V. STATE INDUSTRIAL INSURANCE SYSTEM; WOHLFORD ET UX. V. UNITED STATES; SIAS V. SINGLETARY, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; CORETHERS V. STATE OF OHIO PROSECUTOR ET AL.; MENDEZ V. ZINGERS; PEEPLES V. ILLINOIS; TALON V. BROWN, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS; MANTILLA V. UNITED STATES, IN RE MONROE

Citator

Cited By

• Saenz v. ROE, 526 U.S. 489 (U.S. 1999)
  …(RI 1998) (holding durational residency requirement a penalty on right to travel incapable of surviving rational-basis review). Two state courts have reached the same conclusion. See Mitchell v. Steffen, 504 N. W. 2d 198 (Minn. 1993), cert. denied, 510 U. S. 1081 (1994) (striking down a similar provision in Minnesota law); Sanchez v. Department of Human Services, 314 N. J. Super. 11, 713 A. 2d 1056 (1998) (striking down two-tier welfare system); cf. Jones v. Milwaukee County, 168 Wis. 2d 892, 485 N. W. 2d 21…
• Sterling Crayton v. Callahan, 120 F.3d 1217 (11th Cir. 1997)
  …ication of the three-part test, particularly a line of cases decided by the Eighth Circuit, including Titus v. Sullivan, 4 F. 3d 590 (8th Cir.1993); Schoolcraft v. Sullivan, 971 F. 2d 81 (8th Cir.1992), cert. denied sub nom., Shalala v. Schoolcraft, 510 U.S. 1081, 114 S.Ct. 902, 127 L.Ed.2d 93 (1994); and Mental Health Ass’n of Minnesota v. Heckler, 720 F. 2d 965 (8th Cir.1983). We are unpersuaded as to the correctness of these cases or that they require a waiver in this ease. We hold only that in this ca…