SYLVESTER COPELAND, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By (15 total)

• Wale v. State, 397 So. 2d 738 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981)
  …2d 350 (Fla.1979); Winchell v. State, 362 So. 2d 992 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1978); Norman v. State, 362 So. 2d 444 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978); Norris v. State, 351 So. 2d 729 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1977); Dixon v. State, 343 So. 2d 1345 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1977); Zicca v. State, 232 So. 2d 414 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1970). In the present case, we find sufficient “other” circumstances conjoined with the appellant’s non-exclusive possession of the premises, which, if proved at trial, would create a jury question as to the appellant’s possession of…
• Dixon v. State, 343 So. 2d 1345 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977)
  …. 2d 481 (Fla.3d DCA 1974).5 See also Mattson v. State, 328 So. 2d 246 (Fla.lst DCA 1976). The existence of probable cause to believe that the driver of the automobile was in possession of the marijuana was particularly apparent. See Zicca v. State, 232 So. 2d 414 (Fla.3d DCA 1970). Cf. Porter, supra; D.M.M. v. State, 275 So. 2d [*1349] 308 (Fla.2d DCA 1973); Arant v. State, 256 So. 2d 515 (Fla.1st DCA 1972). A search incident to arrest or to establishment of probable cause to arrest may be made of the defen…
• Winchell v. State, 362 So. 2d 992 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978)
  …n any event, the question of scienter or knowledge is one which must be resolved by the jury under the evidence in the case and upon proper instruction by the court embodying the principles didscussed above.” Id. at 120-21. See also Zicca v. State, 232 So. 2d 414 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970). In applying this standard to the instant case, the record reflects that the motel room involved was in the joint possession of appellant along with her co-defendant. Under these circumstances, as stated in Frank, appellant’s know…

Authorities Cited

• Calloway Brown v. State, 232 So. 2d 55 (Fla. 4th DCA 1970)