MURR
v.
UNITED STATES; ROJAS V. UNITED STATES; WHITED V. UNITED STATES; HUCKELBY V. UNITED STATES; AND PHIBBS V. UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1994-02-22
Nos. 93-1093; No. 93-6682; No. 93-6725; No. 93-6777; No. 93-7347
510 U.S. 1119 Supreme Court of the United States (1994) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Hess v. Port Auth. Trans-Hudson Corp., 513 U.S. 30 (U.S. 1994)
    …4) (most significant factor is whether entity has power to raise its own funds); Hutsell v. Sayre, 5 F. 3d 996, 999 (CA6 1993) (“The most important factor ... is whether any monetary judgment would be paid out of the state treasury.”), cert. denied, 510 U. S. 1119 (1994); Metcalf & Eddy, Inc. v. Puerto Rico Aqueduct and Sewer Authority, 991 F. 2d 935, 942-943 (CA1 1993) (“First, and most fundamentally, [the entity’s] inability to tap the Commonwealth treasury or pledge the Commonwealth’s credit leaves it unab…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw