ALLEN & CO., INC.
v.
PACIFIC DUNLOP HOLDINGS INC.

U.S. | 1994-02-24
No. 93-201
510 U.S. 1160 Supreme Court of the United States (1994) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Gustafson v. Alloyd Co., Inc., 513 U.S. 561 (U.S. 1995)
    …y the Report, moreover, is that the civil liability sections are exacting. Compare Pacific Dunlop Holdings Inc. v. Allen & Co. Inc., 993 F. 2d 578 (CA7 1993) (applying § 12(2) to secondary transactions), cert. granted, 510 U. S. 1083, cert. dism’d, 510 U. S. 1160 (1994), with First Union Discount Brokerage Services, Inc. v. Milos, 997 F. 2d 835, 842-844 (CA11 1993) (holding §12(2) inapplicable to secondary transactions); Ballay v. Legg Mason Wood Walker, Inc., 925 F. 2d 682 (CA3) (same), cert. denied, 502 U.…
  • …preceding Munsingwear. See, e. g., Schenley Distilling Corp. v. Anderson, 333 U. S. 878 (1948) (per curiam). [*24] Nor has the post-Munsingwear practice been as uniform as petitioner claims. See, e. g., Allen & Co. v. Pacific Dunlop Holdings, Inc., 510 U. S. 1160 (1994); Minnesota Newspaper Assn., Inc. v. Postmaster General, 488 U. S. 998 (1989); St. Luke's Federation of Nurses and Health Professionals v. Presbyterian/St. Lukes Medical Center, 459 U. S. 1025 (1982).2 Of course all of those decisions, both gr…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw