GEORGE WINSTON AND RUTH WINSTON, APPELLANTS,
v.
RUTH M. ABELOW, APPELLEE
GEORGE WINSTON AND RUTH WINSTON, APPELLANTS,
RUTH M. ABELOW, APPELLEE
232 So. 2d 762
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1970)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
The record on appeal briefs, and arguments of counsel having been considered and it appearing therefrom that the appellants have failed to demonstrate reversible error, the final judgment appealed herein is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Winston v. Abelow, 238 So. 2d 110 (Fla. 1970)…Certiorari denied. 232 So. 2d 762. ERVIN, C. J., and ROBERTS, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.…
-
Brown v. Warren Wooten Ford, Inc., 245 So. 2d 268 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971)…bile retail installment contract. We reverse. We do so because there exists a genuine issue of a material fact as to whether there was a public sale of the repossessed vehicle. See Great Dane Trailers, Inc. v. A-l Truck Rentals, Inc., Fla.App.1970, 232 So. 2d 762. The existence of a genuine issue as to a material fact bars the granting of a summary judgment. Leaks v. Adeimy, Fla.App.1967, 195 So. 2d 47; O’Grady v. Wickman, Fla.App.1968, 213 So. 2d 321; Holl v. Talcott, Fla.1966,191 So. 2d 40. The above issu…