RODRIGUEZ DIAZ

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Calderon, 127 F.3d 1314 (11th Cir. 1997)
  …e repeatedly stated, “ ‘common’ for the purposes of this test means ‘similar’ or ‘substantially the same’ rather than ‘shared’ or ‘coordinate.’ ” Coy, 19 F. 3d at 633. (citing United States v. Adams, 1 F. 3d 1566, 1584 (11th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1198, 114 S.Ct. 1310, 127 L.Ed.2d 660 (1994) (“common goal” inquiry satisfied by the common crime of conspirators: importation of marijuana); LaSpesa, 956 F. 2d at 1031 (same: fraud); United States v. Jones, 913 F. 2d 1552, 1561 (11th Cir.1990) (same: di…
• United States v. Norbert Schlei, 122 F.3d 944 (11th Cir. 1997)
  …the enormous disparity in the evidence admissible against him compared to the other defendants.” We must review the denial of a motion for severance for abuse of discretion. United States v. Adams, 1 F. 3d 1566, 1578 (11th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1198, 114 S.Ct. 1310, 127 L.Ed.2d 660 (1994). Rule 8(b) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure permits the Government to join two or more defendants “in the same indictment or information if they are alleged to have participated in the same act or t…