TERRELL

v.

CALIFORNIA

Citator

Cited By

• Taylor v. State, 710 So. 2d 636 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)
  …k he is entitled. State v. Frazier, 697 So. 2d 944 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997); Kirkland v. State, 633 So. 2d 1138 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994). Because, under Doyle v. State, 615 So. 2d 278 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993), review denied, 629 So. 2d 132 (Fla.1993), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1007, 114 S.Ct. 1376, 128 L.Ed.2d 52 (1994), the trial court cannot order the Department of Corrections to allow the defendant to serve his state time in federal custody,1 we conclude it is appropriate that the trial court forthwith vacate the sentence a…
• Glenn v. State, 776 So. 2d 330 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)
  …ks the authority to order the Department of Corrections to permit an inmate to serve his Florida sentence concurrently with a federal sentence through transfer to a federal prison. See Doyle v. State, 615 So. 2d 278 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1007, 114 S.Ct. 1376, 128 L.Ed.2d 52 (1994); Schlosser v. Singletary, 597 So. 2d 304 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991). The trial court, adopting the state’s response, summarily denied Glenn’s motion. We reverse and remand for further proceedings. Where a condition o…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Davis v. State, 852 So. 2d 355 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003)
  …courts.1 Hence, an order providing that a state sentence is to be served concurrently with a federal sentence is really only a recommendation. Doyle v. State, 615 So. 2d 278 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 629 So. 2d 132 (Fla.1993), and cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1007, 114 S.Ct. 1376, 128 L.Ed.2d 52 (1994). The court in Taylor v. State, 710 So. 2d 636 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998), formulated the appropriate remedy to resolve this problem when it held that the trial court should “forthwith vacate the sentence already impos…