WOODWARD
v.
UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1994-04-18
No. 93-8145
511 U.S. 1041 Supreme Court of the United States (1994) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • United States v. Bell, 137 F.3d 1274 (11th Cir. 1998)
    …ral rule among the circuits has been that the Pinkerton doctrine is applicable in section 924(c) eases, see, e.g. United States v. McManus, 23 F. 3d 878, 883 (4th Cir.1994), United States v. Castaneda, 9 F. 3d 761, 765 (9th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1041, 114 S.Ct. 1564, 128 L.Ed.2d 210 (1994); United States v. Davis, 1 F. 3d 1014, 1017 (10th Cir.1993). The district court correctly held that the Supreme Court’s opinion in Bailey did not preclude the application of Pinkerton liability in Bell’s case…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw