DUDLEY LEWIS LEE, APPELLANT,

v.

THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Valle v. State, 394 So. 2d 1004 (Fla. 1981)
  …from arraignment, given the type of offense, limited number of witnesses, or requisite investigation period that may be necessary. See United States v. Pelton, 578 F. 2d 701 (8th Cir. 1978) (twenty-day period from arrest to trial); Berriel v. State, 233 So. 2d 163 (Fla. 4th DCA 1970) (counsel appointed five days prior to trial). The instant death case, however, does not fall within that category. We conclude that this cause was expedited in such a manner that it denied appellant his basic rights to a fair tr…
• Kimbrough v. State, 352 So. 2d 925 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977)
  …the information. Any appeal seeking a reversal of a conviction on the ground of denial of a continuance necessarily attacks the discretion exercised by the trial court since only a palpable abuse of discretion justifies reversal. Berriel v. State, 233 So. 2d 163 (Fla. 4th DC A 1970). Nevertheless the reasonableness of the time of appointment must be taken into consideration. We stated in Hawkins v. State, 184 So. 2d 486 (Fla. 1st DCA 1966), that even though counsel had been appointed to represent defendants…
• Robinson v. State, 256 So. 2d 29 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971)
  …not be disturbed unless an abuse of discretion is demonstrated on the record. Acree v. State, 153 Fla. 561, 15 So. 2d 262; Matera v. State, Fla. App.1969, 218 So. 2d 180; Thomas v. State, Fla.App.1969, 223 So. 2d 391; Berriel v. State, Fla.App.1970, 233 So. 2d 163. It is readily apparent from the record in the instant case that the appellant, by her own actions, contributed to the change of counsel prior to trial in this cause. The public defender’s office was on notice that he represented the defendant at le…

Authorities Cited

• Foreman v. State, 213 So. 2d 754 (Fla. 1st DCA 1968)