JACKSONVILLE ELECTRIC AUTHORITY, APPELLANT,
v.
THE BOARD OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION OF DUVAL COUNTY, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Jacksonville Electric Authority appeals a jury verdict awarding the Board of Public Instruction of Duval County $335,864.98 in damages for allegedly charging illegal and discriminatory electric rates. The appellate court affirmed the judgment, finding sufficient evidence supported the jury's verdict.
The court affirmed the judgment, finding that there was sufficient competent and substantial evidence in the trial transcript from which the jury could reasonably conclude that the plaintiff proved its allegations and was entitled to the damages awarded.
[1] A jury verdict and judgment will be affirmed on appeal if supported by sufficient competent and substantial evidence.
[2] An appellate court will not substitute its judgment for that of the jury on questions of fact when sufficient competent evidence supports the jury's conclusion.
Previewing 2 of 3 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“The basic question presented for our determination in this appeal is whether there was sufficient competent evidence adduced at the trial to support the said verdict and judgment.”
Establishes the standard of review on appeal—whether sufficient evidence supports the jury verdict.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe Board of Public Instruction purchased electricity from Jacksonville Electric Authority for use at its school buildings. The Authority allegedly ch…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Sufficiency Of Evidence cases and more on FLexlaw
The defendant in an action for damages for charging illegal and discriminatory electric rates has appealed from a final judgment entered by the Circuit Court for Duval County, based upon a jury verdict.
The basic question presented for our determination in this appeal is whether there was sufficient competent evidence adduced at the trial to support the said verdict and judgment.
The plaintiff, the board of public instruction of the county in which the City of Jacksonville is located, alleges in its complaint that the defendant operates the electric system in Jacksonville and the surrounding areas, and the plaintiff purchases electricity from the defendant for use at the plaintiff’s school buildings; that the plaintiff was entitled to be charged a certain rate for electricity furnished to its schools, but the defendant had charged the plaintiff at incorrect higher rates; that the latter rates, selected by the defendant, were discriminatory and excessive in comparison to the rates to which the plaintiff was entitled, resulting in an overcharge to plaintiff.
Trial was held before a jury, which returned a verdict awarding to the plaintiff damages in the amount of $335,864.98. The defendant’s motions for a directed verdict and for a judgment in accordance with its motion for directed verdict or new trial, were denied by the trial court.
It would serve no useful purpose to detail here the evidence set forth in the 375 pages of the trial transcript, but suffice it to say that we have examined the said transcript and find therein sufficient competent and substantial evidence from which the jury could have reasonably concluded that the plaintiff had proved the allegations of its complaint and was entitled to the award in the said verdict. Under these circumstances, neither the trial court nor this court is authorized to substitute its judgment for that of the jury as to such questions of fact.
We have considered the other points raised by the defendant in this appeal, and find them to be without substantial merit.
Therefore, the final judgment appealed from herein must be and it is
Affirmed.
JOHNSON, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K. and RAWLS, JJ., concur.