THE BROOKSVILLE ABSTRACT COMPANY, A CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
v.
C. C. KIRK, AS TAX COLLECTOR OF HERNANDO COUNTY, FLORIDA, ET AL., APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Brooksville Abstract Company sought to enjoin collection of taxes on its abstract plant, arguing the property had no value except in its hands and was therefore not subject to taxation. The Florida Supreme Court affirmed dismissal of the complaint, holding that an abstract plant is tangible property subject to taxation regardless of its limited marketability.
An abstract plant is tangible property possessing the attribute of value and is subject to taxation despite its limited utility to persons other than the owner. The circuit court properly allowed intervention by the City of Brooksville as a party with material interest in the litigation.
“It is a matter of common knowledge that an abstract plant is tangible property possessing the attribute of value.”
Establishes that despite the company's characterization of the plant as valueless to others, it is indisputably tangible taxable property with value.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe Brooksville Abstract Company filed a bill of complaint against the tax collectors of Hernando County and the City of Brooksville seeking to enjoin…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Tangible Personal Property Taxation cases and more on FLexlaw
In this case appellant filed bill of complaint against C. C. Kirk as Tax Collector of Hernando County, and P. H. Grelle as Tax Collector of the City of Brooksville in Hernando County, to enjoin the collection of the tax assessed by the County Tax Assessor against personal property of the appellant, the same being what is commonly known as an abstract plant, and to enjoin *176the collection of the tax on the same property assessed by the Tax Assessor of the City of Brooksville.
Neither the City of Brooksville nor the County of Hernando was made a party to the bill of complaint. The. Circuit Court by its order allowed the City of Brooksville by it attorneys to intervene and to file a demurrer. From the order allowing the intervention and filing of the de-. murrer appeal was taken.
The County of Hernando and the City of Brooksville are each shown by the bill of complaint to be parties at interest in the litigation and, therefore, it was proper for the court to allow either, or both, to intervene.
The bill of complaint was multifarious as to parties, but aside from this the bill of complaint alleges no facts whatever upon which equitable relief should be granted.
There is no equity in the bill as to either of the defendants. The ground upon which the injunction is sought is upon the theory as expressed in the bill, that the property upon which the tax is assessed is of such peculiar character that it is valuable only to the complainants and would be without value in the hands of other persons and is, therefore, not subject to taxation as tangible personal property.
In the bill it is alleged that “its said abstract plant is without value except in the hands of complainant, and to the extent that complainant chooses to use same as a basis for producing documents of salable value; and that in the hands of any other person than complainant, said plant would be valueless, saving only as said complainant might lend value thereto by explaining the contents thereof, or assisting in the use thereof, and saving further only the intrinsic value of the few pounds of paper and bottles of ink, and other materials composing said plant, which intrinsic value is so small as to be negligible.” ■
*177It is a matter of common knowledge that an abstract plant is tangible property possessing the attribute of value.
There are no allegations in the bill upon which relief prayed for could be based.
The order appealed from should be affirmed with directions that the demurrer be sustained and the bill be dismissed. It is so ordered.
Buford, C.J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell, Brown and Davis, J.J., concur.