DEPUTY
v.
SNYDER, WARDEN
DEPUTY
SNYDER, WARDEN
512 U.S. 1230
Supreme Court of the United States (1994)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 5 cases
Dissent
Justice Blackmun,
dissenting.
Adhering to my view that the death penalty cannot be imposed fairly within the constraints of our Constitution, see my dissent in Callins v. Collins, 510 U. S. 1141, 1143 (1994), I would grant the application for stay of execution and the petition for certiorari and would vacate the death sentence in this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
The League OF Women Voters OF Fla. v. Detzner, 179 So. 3d 258 (Fla. 2015)…icting- plan] was passed by a legislative alliance between the Black and the Republican Caucuses, historically uncommon bedfellows but,', according to expert testimony, á phenomenon occurring with increasing frequency across the country.”), vacated, 512 U.S. 1230, 114 S.Ct. 2731, 129 L.Ed.2d 853 (1994). To understand the effect on the redistricting process, consider the example of State X, a small state comprised of fifty people. Thirty people belong to the Orange party and twenty'people belong to the Purpl…
-
Miller v. Johnson, 515 U.S. 900 (U.S. 1995)…s applying Shaw have recognized, is that parties may rely on evidence other than bizarreness to establish race-based districting. See Shaw v. Hunt, 861 F. Supp. 408, 431 (EDNC 1994); Hays v. Louisiana, 839 F. Supp. 1188, 1195 (WD La. 1993), vacated, 512 U. S. 1230 (1994); but see DeWitt v. Wilson, 856 F. Supp. 1409, 1413 (ED Cal. 1994). Our reasoning in Shaw compels this conclusion. We recognized in Shaw that, outside the districting context, statutes are subject to strict scrutiny under the Equal Protection…
-
United States v. Hays, 515 U.S. 737 (U.S. 1995)…led Act 42 and enacted a new district-ing plan, Act 1 of the 1994 Second Extraordinary Session. The Attorney General precleared Act 1. We then vacated the District Court’s judgment and remanded the case “for further consideration in light of Act 1.” 512 U. S. 1230 (1994). A map of Act 1 is attached as Appendix B. Act 1, like Act 42, contains two majority-minority districts, one of which (District 2) is again located in the New Orleans area.. The second majority-minority district in Act 1, however, is conside…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Singletary v. Duest, 510 U.S. 1141 (U.S. 1994)
- Baltimore Teachers Union, Am. Fed'n of Teachers Local 340, AFL-CIO v. Mayor & City Council of Baltimore, 510 U.S. 1141 (U.S. 1994)