SNAP-ON TOOLS CORP. ET AL.

v.

EULRICH ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• ST. Johns River Water Mgmt. Dist. v. Coy A. Koontz, 77 So. 3d 1220 (Fla. 2011)
  …ing to St. Johns if accepted. See id. at 12. The Fifth District Court of Appeal also rejected this assertion and concluded that the United States Supreme Court had implicitly decided this issue adverse to St. Johns in Ehrlich v. City of Culver City, 512 U.S. 1231, 114 S.Ct. 2731, 129 L.Ed.2d 854 (1994). See 5 So. 3d at 12. In Ehrlich, the United States Supreme Court vacated a lower court decision that approved the conditioning of a permit on the payment of money to build tennis courts and purchase artwork…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• ST. Johns River Water Mgmt. Dist. v. Coy A. Koontz, Jr., 5 So. 3d 8 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009)
  …e a physical dedication of land but instead a requirement that Mr. Koontz expend money to improve land belonging to the District. Again, we conclude that the Supreme Court has already implicitly decided this issue. In Ehrlich v. City of Culver City, 512 U.S. 1231, 114 S.Ct. 2731, 129 L.Ed.2d 854 (1994), the city conditioned a permit on the payment of money to build tennis courts and purchase artwork. Although the state appellate court upheld the imposition of the conditions, the Supreme Court vacated the dec…