MARTINEZ-MONCIVAIS

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Twitty, 107 F.3d 1482 (11th Cir. 1997)
  …defendant, the financial needs and earning ability of the defendant and the defendant’s dependents, and such other factors as the court deems appropriate.” § 3664(a); see also United States v. Barnette, 10 F. 3d 1553, 1556 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 816, 115 S.Ct. 74, 130 L.Ed.2d 28 (1994). The district court must evaluate the defendant’s financial condition and ability to pay before determining the restitution amount. United States v. Cobbs, 967 F. 2d 1555, 1558 (11th Cir.1992); United States v.…
• United States v. Perla Martin Davis, 117 F.3d 459 (11th Cir. 1997)
  ….Ed.2d 94 (1992). Each appellant herein had a sufficiently substantial involvement in the fraud scheme to warrant the restitution amount that the district court ordered. See United States v. Barnette, 10 F. 3d 1553, 1556 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 816, 115 S.Ct. 74, 130 L.Ed.2d 28 (1994)(granting restitution to the extent justice requires). Our conclusion follows the general proposition that a defendant is liable for reasonably foreseeable acts of others committed in furtherance of the conspira…