MASTROBUONO ET AL.
v.
SHEARSON LEHMAN HUTTON, INC., ET AL.
MASTROBUONO ET AL.
SHEARSON LEHMAN HUTTON, INC., ET AL.
513 U.S. 921
Supreme Court of the United States (1994)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Sandin v. Conner, 515 U.S. 472 (U.S. 1995)…vidence of misconduct. 15 F. 3d, at 1466. It viewed this as a state-created liberty interest, and therefore held that respondent was entitled to call witnesses by virtue of our opinion in Wolff, supra. We granted the State’s petition for certiorari, 513 U. S. 921 (1994), and now reverse. HH I — I Our due process analysis begins with Wolff. There, Nebraska inmates challenged the decision of prison officials to revoke good time credits without adequate procedures. 418 U. S., at 553. Inmates earned good time…
-
Mastrobuono v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc., 514 U.S. 52 (U.S. 1995)…rcised by arbitrators, Garrity v. Lyle Stuart, Inc., 40 N. Y. 2d 354, 353 N. E. 2d 793 (1976), the District Court and the Seventh Circuit held that the panel of arbitrators had no power to award punitive damages in this case. We granted certiorari, 513 U. S. 921 (1994), because the Courts of Appeals have expressed differing views on whether a contractual choice-of-law provision may preclude an arbitral award of punitive damages that otherwise would be proper. Compare Barbier v. Shearson Lehman Hutton Inc.,…