EDWARD NORRIS NEAL, JR., APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
EDWARD NORRIS NEAL, JR., APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
234 So. 2d 158
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1970)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
Appellant appeals a judgment and sentence entered by the trial judge sitting without a jury.
Appellant argues two points on his appeal, to-wit: (1) the evidence was insufficient; and (2) certain monies were improperly admitted into evidence.
As to the second point, the appellant did not assign as error the admission of the monies into evidence and, therefore, cannot rely upon this point for reversal.1
As to appellant’s fir^t point, we have carefully examined the record-on-appeal and conclude that there is ample evidence upon which to sustain the judgment and sentence appealed.
Affirmed.
HOBSON, C. J., and PIERCE and Mc-NULTY, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Navarro v. State, 264 So. 2d 469 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972)…PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Fine v. State, 153 Fla. 297, 14 So. 2d 408; Sinclair v. State, Fla.1950, 46 So. 2d 453; Tracey v. State, Fla.1961, 130 So. 2d 605; Garner v. State, Fla.App. 1968, 208 So. 2d 499; Neal v. State, Fla.App.1970, 234 So. 2d 158; Rule 3.190(b) (c), Cr.PR, 33 F.S.A.…
Authorities Cited
- Grady Allen Belger v. State, 171 So. 2d 574 (Fla. 1st DCA 1965)
- Arbra Green v. City OF Hollywood, 174 So. 2d 538 (Fla. 1965)
- Allen v. State, 174 So. 2d 538 (Fla. 1965)