STUART, GUARDIAN AD LITEM FOR STUART, AND ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF STUART, DECEASED

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Batten v. CSX Transp., Inc., 811 So. 2d 673 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001)
  …erial fact as to whether Batten “possess[ed] all the critical facts necessary to recognize injury and causation until [he was] examined and diagnosed by a physician” in 1999. CSX Transp., Inc. v. Adkins, 442 S.E. 2d 737, 738 (Ga.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 947 (1994). Accordingly, it was error for the trial court to grant summary judgment as to Count II and we reverse that part of the order on appeal. AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.…
• Ross v. Clayton Cnty., 173 F.3d 1305 (11th Cir. 1999)
  …here “the statute or regulation places substantive restrictions on the discretion to demote an employee, such as providing that discipline may only be imposed for cause”); Williams v. Kentucky, 24 F. 3d 1526, 1537-38 (6th Cir.) (same), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 947, 115 S.Ct. 358, 130 L.Ed.2d 312 (1994). Thus, although the majority of public employment procedural due process cases deal with situations where the employee was discharged, we proceed with our analysis with the understanding that a property intere…