DIAMOND SHAMROCK REFINING & MARKETING CO.
v.
NUECES COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT ET AL.

U.S. | 1994-11-07
No. 94-466
513 U.S. 995 Supreme Court of the United States (1994) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Ark. Educ. Television Comm'n v. Forbes, 523 U.S. 666 (U.S. 1998)
    …airly attributable to the State and subject to the Fourteenth Amendment, unlike the actions of privately owned broadcast licensees.” Forbes v. Arkansas Educational Television Communication Network Foundation, 22 F. 3d 1423, 1428 (CA8), cert. denied, 513 U. S. 995 (1994), 514 U. S. 1110 (1995). The AETC staff members therefore “were not ordinary journalists: they [*687] were employees of government.” 93 F. 3d, at 505. The Court implicitly acknowledges these facts by subjecting the decision to exclude Forbes…
    1 / 2
  • McWILLIAMS v. Jefferson S. Dunn, 137 S. Ct. 1790 (U.S. 2017)

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw