INGRAM
v.
UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1994-11-14
No. 94-6420
513 U.S. 1007 Supreme Court of the United States (1994) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • United States v. Tham, 118 F.3d 1501 (11th Cir. 1997)
    …ot require proof of premeditation or deliberation). That the killing resulted from commission of an enumerated felony suffices to establish the requisite malice aforethought. See United States v. Thomas, 34 F. 3d 44, 48-49 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1007, 115 S.Ct. 527, 130 L.Ed.2d 431 (1994). We therefore hold that the -malice aforethought requirement poses no impediment to sentencing Appellant Tham with reference to the first-degree murder sentencing guideline. Although the district court conclu…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw