THE BOARD OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION OF DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA, PETITIONER,
v.
DENA H. FELLER, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHER SCHOOL TEACHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, RESPONDENT

Fla. | 1970-04-15
No. 39341
Roberts, J., Drew, J., Carlton, J., Boyd, J., Ervin, C.J.
234 So. 2d 356 Florida Supreme Court (1970)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

Under Florida Statutes § 57.041, a board of public instruction and other state agencies may be held liable for costs, including reasonable compensation to a court-appointed examiner, contrary to prior precedent.


Headnotes

[1] Under Florida Statutes § 57.041, state agencies and boards may be held liable for costs in judicial proceedings, including reasonable compensation to court-appointed exam…

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

The Board of Public Instruction of Dade County appealed a District Court decision affirming an award of costs against it for compensation owed to a co…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

This cause is before us on petition for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the District Court of Appeal, Third District, reported at 229 So.2d 598. That decision affirmed the award of costs against the Board of Public Instruction holding the Board liable for reasonable compensation to be paid to a court appointed examiner for his work in examining the records of the School Board. Conflict is alleged with the decision of this Court in Palethorpe v. Thomson, 171 So.2d 526 (Fal.1965), a case holding that the State or its agencies may not be held liable for costs unless expressly provided for by statute.

The District Court in affirming the costs award held that the order of the lower court entered January 30, 1968, was a final adjudication that the Board was liable for reasonable compensation to be paid to the examiner and the subsequent order of December 10, 1968, simply adjudicated the reasonable amount of that liability. The Court went on to state that the Board’s failure to attack the order of January 30, 1968, holding it liable for costs, barred the Board’s right to challenge this point on appeal. We find it unnecessary to pass on *357the correctness of the District Court’s decision on this point since the decision of this Court in Simpson v. Merrill, 234 So.2d 350, retreats from the Palethorpe decision and holds that under Florida Statutes § 57.041, F.S.A., the State or its agencies may be held liable for costs.

Accordingly, the decision of the District Court is affirmed.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, DREW, CARLTON and BOYD, JJ., concur.

ERVIN, C. J., concurs specially with opinion.

ERVIN, Chief Justice

(concurring specially) .

I concur specially in the foregoing opinion as per my special opinion in Simpson v. Merrill, 234 So.2d 350.

Concurrence
ERVIN, Chief Justice

ERVIN, Chief Justice

(concurring specially) .

I concur specially in the foregoing opinion as per my special opinion in Simpson v. Merrill, 234 So. 2d 350.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw