OWEN
v.
NEBRASKA (TWO CASES); ROBINSON V. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA; IN RE WRIGHT, HUNT V. GRINKER, COMMISSIONER, NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, ET AL.; BOOSTROM V. BACH; CHISUM V. UNITED STATES; MORISSETTE ET AL. V. YU ET AL.; FINIZIE V. CITY OF BRIDGEPORT; ANDERSON V. UNITED STATES; BROCKMAN V. SWEETWATER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1

U.S. | 1994-12-05
Nos. 93-8709; No. 93-9435; No. 93-9614; No. 93-9755; No. 94-182; No. 94-204; No. 94-347; No. 94-353; No. 94-5768; No. 94-5808
513 U.S. 1052 Supreme Court of the United States (1994) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Ricotta v. Univ. OF Miami, 95 So. 3d 290 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012)
    …PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Wood v. Green, 323 F. 3d 1309 (11th Cir.2003), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 982, 124 S.Ct. 467, 157 L.Ed.2d 373 (2003); Jackson v. Veterans Admin., 22 F. 3d 277 (11th Cir.1994), cert. dismissed, 513 U.S. 1052, 115 S.Ct. 657, 130 L.Ed.2d 560 (1994).…
  • Davis v. Fla. Power & Light Co., 205 F.3d 1301 (11th Cir. 2000)
    …s Admin., 22 F. 3d 277 (11th Cir.) (holding under Rehabilitation Act that a housekeeping aid had failed to prove that he was “an otherwise qualified individual because he ha[d] failed to satisfy the presence requirement of his job”), cert. dismissed 513 U.S. 1052, 115 S.Ct. 657, 130 L.Ed.2d 560 (1994); see also Hilburn v. Murata Elecs. N. Am., Inc., 181 F. 3d 1220, 1231 (11th Cir.1999) (citing with approval Tyndall’s discussion of job presence as an essential function under the ADA and concluding plaintiff…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw