LIERENZ

v.

BOWEN ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Sprietsma v. Mercury Marine, 537 U.S. 51 (U.S. 2002)
  …g express pre-emption under the FBSA), with Moore v. Brunswick Bowling & Billiards Corp., 889 S. W. 2d 246 (Tex.) (holding that federal law did not pre-empt state law in this context), cert. denied sub nom. Vivian Industrial Plastics, Inc. v. Moore, 513 U. S. 1057 (1994). See also Lady v. Neal Glaser Marine, Inc., 228 F. 3d 598 (CA5 2000) (holding that common-law claims based on the manufacturer’s failure to provide a propeller guard were impliedly pre-empted by the FBSA; Outboard Marine, the successor to Nea…
• Lewis v. Brunswick Corp., 107 F.3d 1494 (11th Cir. 1997)
  …., 239 Ill.App.3d 885, 180 Ill.Dec. 493, 497-98, 607 N.E. 2d 562, 566-67 (1992); Ryan v. Brunswick Corp., 454 Mich. 20, 557 N.W. 2d 541, 548-49 (1997). Contra Moore v. Brunswick Bowling & Billiards Corp., 889 S.W. 2d 246, 250 (Tex.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1057, 115 S.Ct. 664, 130 L.Ed.2d 599 (1994). We agree that the terms “law” and “regulation” evidence an intent to include common law claims. However, we stop short of concluding that common law claims are expressly preempted by the FBSA, because anothe…