IN RE CARTER ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Pierce v. State, 718 So. 2d 806 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997)
  …make each of the enhanced habitual offender sentences consecutive. Hale v. State, 630 So. 2d 521, 525 (Fla.1993)(enhanced habitual offender sentences for possession and sale of same piece of cocaine could not be consecutively served), cert, denied, 513 U.S. 1066, 115 S.Ct. 686, 130 L.Ed.2d 617 (1994). The legislative intent is satisfied when the maximum for each offense is increased. Id. at 524. This rule was repeated in Brooks v. State, 630 So. 2d 527 (Fla.1993), wherein the supreme court held that consecu…
• Burch v. State, 812 So. 2d 569 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002)
  …at the appellant claims to have been a single criminal episode, were stacked consecutively in violation of the rule announced in Hale v. State, 630 So. 2d 521 (Fla.1993), cert. den. 513 U.S. 909, 115 S.Ct. 278, 130 L.Ed.2d 195 (1994); rehearing den. 513 U.S. 1066, 115 S.Ct. 686, 130 L.Ed.2d 617 (1994). Hale claims are cognizable in rule 3.800(a) motions, so long as the allegations can be resolved from the face of the record and no extra-record facts are necessary. See Valdes v. State, 765 So. 2d 774, 776 (…