ROBERTS
v.
TOWN OF CANTON ET AL.

U.S. | 1995-01-17
No. 94-894
513 U.S. 1111 Supreme Court of the United States (1995) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • O'Sullivan v. Boerckel, 526 U.S. 838 (U.S. 1999)
    …sue. 525 U. S. 999 (1998). Compare e.g., Richardson v. Procunier, 762 F. 2d 429 (CA5 1985) (must file petition for discretionary review), with Dolny v. Erickson, 32 F. 3d 381 (CA8 1994) (petition for discretionary review not required), cert. denied, 513 U. S. 1111 (1995). — 1 1 — 1 Before a federal court may grant habeas relief to a state prisoner, the prisoner must exhaust his remedies in state court. In other words, the state prisoner must give the state courts an opportunity to act on his claims before…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw