REYNOLDS
v.
UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1995-01-17
No. 94-1032
513 U.S. 1113 Supreme Court of the United States (1995) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • …o.’’), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 1186, — L.Ed.2d - (1998); Forbus v. Sears Roebuck & Co., 30 F. 3d 1402, 1404 (11th Cir.1994) (“A district court’s decision to grant or deny leave to amend is reviewed for abuse of discretion.”), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1113, 115 S.Ct, 906, 130 L.Ed.2d 788 (1995). III. CONTENTIONS As to the first issue, the Turtles contend that Volusia County’s incidental take permit authorizes only incidental takes of sea turtles from beach driving, not from artificial beachfront ligh…
  • First Union Nat'l Bank OF Fla. v. Hall, 123 F.3d 1374 (11th Cir. 1997)
    …claims involving Hall and First Union on the merits. Thus, Hall’s first argument fails. III. A. We review a district court’s grant of summary judgment de novo. See Forbus v. Sears Roebuck & Co., 30 F. 3d 1402, 1404 (11th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1113, 115 S.Ct. 906, 130 L.Ed.2d 788 (1995). In order to survive summary judgment, the nonmoving party must submit evidence sufficient to create a material issue of fact as to each element of its claim. See Real Estate Fin. v. Resolution Trust Corp., 9…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw