BEIL

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Franqui v. State (Fla. 1997)
  …ich carried lengthy maximum penalties, was not entitled to an instruction informing the jury of the maximum sentences for other crimes as a mitigating factor. We addressed a similar issue in Marquard v. State, 641 So. 2d 54 (Fla.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1132, 115 S.Ct. 946, 130 L.Ed.2d 890 (1995). In that case, the trial court, after the State’s objection, cut off defense counsel’s penalty phase concluding argument at the point where he began discussing hypothetical sentencing on an armed robbery count.…
• Marquard v. Sec'y FOR THE Dep't OF Corr., 429 F.3d 1278 (11th Cir. 2005)
  …t the court could sentence Marquard to consecutive life sentences for the armed robbery and the murder, which would likely ensure that Marquard would spend the rest of his life in prison. The Supreme Court denied the petition. Marquard v. Florida, 513 U.S. 1132, 115 S.Ct. 946, 130 L.Ed.2d 890 (1995). H. Post-conviction 3.850 Motion Marquard then filed in the Florida circuit court a motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, and subsequently amended that motion.…
• United States v. Tham, 118 F.3d 1501 (11th Cir. 1997)
  …rlying felony; no other mens rea is required. United States v. Flores, 63 F. 3d 1342, 1371 (5th Cir.1995), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 87, 136 L.Ed.2d 43 (1996); United States v. Chischilly, 30 F. 3d 1144, 1159-60 (9th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1132, 115 S.Ct. 946, 130 L.Ed.2d 890 (1995); Cole, supra, at 74; see also United States v. Antelope, 430 U.S. 641, 644, 97 S.Ct. 1395, 1397-98, 51 L.Ed.2d 701 (1977) (recognizing that the felony murder component of 18 U.S.C. § 1111 does not require proof…