MARQUEZ

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Wright, 117 F.3d 1265 (11th Cir. 1997)
  …ermination, we review, as always, the district court’s application of the Sentencing Guidelines de novo. See United States v. Purchess, 107 F. 3d 1261, 1265-66 (7th Cir.1997); United States v. Diaz, 26 F. 3d 1533, 1544 (11th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1134, 115 S.Ct. 952, 130 L.Ed.2d 895 (1995). We recently reiterated that the acceptance of responsibility determination is a “multifaceted concept” that depends on such factors as “the offender’s recognition of the wrongdoing of his conduct, his remors…
• United States v. Bourne, 130 F.3d 1444 (11th Cir. 1997)
  …ve years, a $50 special assessment and restitution. II. STANDARD OF REVIEW Our standard of review of a district court’s application of the Sentencing Guidelines is de novo. United States v. Diaz, 26 F. 3d 1533, 1544 (11th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1134, 115 S.Ct. 952, 130 L.Ed.2d 895 (1995). We review the district court’s factual findings as to the amount of restitution under the clearly erroneous standard. United States v. Asseff, 917 F. 2d 502, 505 (11th Cir.1990). III. DISCUSSION a. Accept…