BOWLES
v.
ASKEW, DIRECTOR OF ADMISSIONS, OFFICE OF BAR ADMISSIONS, ET AL.

U.S. | 1995-02-21
No. 94-1179
513 U.S. 1155 Supreme Court of the United States (1995) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Mills v. Singletary, 161 F.3d 1273 (11th Cir. 1998)
    …17 F. 3d at 1371. Once a defendant has engaged in sufficient cross-examination to satisfy the Confrontation Clause, further questioning is within the trial court’s discretion. United States v. Diaz, 26 F. 3d 1533, 1539 (11th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1155, 115 S.Ct. 1110, 130 L.Ed.2d 1075 (1995). We hold that the trial court neither violated Mills’s rights under the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment nor abused its discretion in limiting cross-examination of Ashley. During cross-examination…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw