HARRIS
v.
RICHARDSON, COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
HARRIS
RICHARDSON, COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
513 U.S. 1173
Supreme Court of the United States (1995)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Bailey, 123 F.3d 1381 (11th Cir. 1997)…the verdict: if the jury had concluded that Agent Hudson’s testimony was false, then it would have disregarded the testimony; if not, there was no falsehood to disregard. See United States v. Gowen, 32 F. 3d 1466, 1471 (10th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1173, 115 S.Ct. 1151, 130 L.Ed.2d 1109 (1995); see also United States v. Blair, 958 F. 2d 26, 29 (2d Cir.1992) (“[Pjerjured testimony must have remained undisclosed during trial in order to require reversal of a conviction.”). Significantly, “[ojnly kn…