ERNEST PARKER, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1970-05-05
No. 69-1068
Before CHARLES CARROLL, BARK-DULL and HENDRY, JJ.
235 So. 2d 44 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1970) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

This court, proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, having deferred ruling on a motion of the public defender to withdraw as counsel for the indigent defendant-appellant, and having furnished appellant with a copy of the public defender’s memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellant a reasonable specified time within which to raise any points that he chose in support of his appeal, and the appellant having failed to respond thereto, on consideration thereof upon full examination of the proceedings we conclude that the appeal is wholly frivolous. Whereupon, the public defender’s said motion to withdraw is granted, and the order or judgment appealed is hereby affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Jones v. State, 256 So. 2d 46 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971)
    …ed the officer what time the complaining witness had told him the alleged robbery took place. The testimony sought to be elicited [*47] thereby was inadmissible under the hearsay rule, and was properly excluded. See Har-rolle v. State, Fla.App.1970, 235 So. 2d 44, 45. Affirmed.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw