SHARP
v.
VIRGINIA STATE BAR

U.S. | 1995-02-21
No. 94-7500
513 U.S. 1175 Supreme Court of the United States (1995) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • United States v. Vincent, 121 F.3d 1451 (11th Cir. 1997)
    …pon. The object need not be seen by the intended victim. See United States v. Johnson, 37 F. 3d 1352, 1354 (9th Cir.1994) (“We are aware of no definition of ‘possess’ that requires an object to be visible in order to be possessed.”), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1175, 115 S.Ct. 1155, 130 L.Ed.2d 1112 (1995) (citing United States v. Pool, 937 F. 2d 1528, 1530-31 (10th Cir.1991)). The critical factor triggering the application of section 2B3.1(b)(2)(E) is whether the defendant intended that the object appear to b…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw