IN RE DOW JONES & CO., INC.
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Dow Jones & Company sought emergency relief from the Supreme Court to publish a sealed order from the Court of Appeals denying its request for access to a former Independent Counsel's report. Chief Justice Rehnquist found the application moot because the Court of Appeals subsequently issued an unsealed order addressing the same matter, which Dow Jones was free to publish and report on without restriction.
© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Chief Justice Rehnquist, Circuit Justice.
On November 3,1994, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, Division for Appointing Independent Counsels, issued an order denying Dow Jones & Company, Inc.’s (Dow Jones) “Motion for Disclosure of and Access to Report of Former Independent Counsel Robert B. Fiske.” That order was filed “under seal,” apparently to prohibit Dow Jones from publishing or reporting on the order or its contents. Dow Jones subsequently filed a motion to unseal the November 3, 1994, order (which has not been ruled on) and a motion for reconsideration of the November 3,1994, order.
On November 22, 1994, Dow Jones filed in this Court an emergency application for stay of the November 3, 1994, order, seeking permission only to publish and report on the Court of Appeals’ order and its contents. The following day, the Court of Appeals denied Dow Jones’ previously filed motion for reconsideration by an order in which it discussed the November 3, 1994, order and its contents, and gave its rea sons for refusing to release the report of Independent Counsel Fiske. This order was not filed “under seal,” and there is no indication that Dow Jones is prohibited from reporting on or publishing this order. Because Dow Jones may report on and publish this second order, which refers to the November 3,1994, order and its contents, I believe that Dow Jones’ emergency application for stay is moot.