BRYAN ET AL.
v.
JAMES E. HOLMES REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, AKA HOLMES REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, INC.

U.S. | 1995-03-20
No. 94-1323
514 U.S. 1019 Supreme Court of the United States (1995) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • James Noble, M.D. v. Martin Mem'l Hosp. Ass'n, Inc., 710 So. 2d 567 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997)
    …compliance and relied upon a recent federal decision which held that compliance with the procedural requirements of the HCQIA entitled them to immunity as a matter of law. Bryan v. Holmes Reg’l Med. Ctr., 33 F. 3d 1318 (11th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1019, 115 S.Ct. 1363, 131 L.Ed.2d 220 (1995). The trial court reviewed the criteria and judicially determined, as is appropriate, that immunity protected the appel-lees in this case. We have also reviewed the record and find that the trial court properly…
  • Duard BOK, M.D. v. Mut. Assurance, Inc., 119 F.3d 927 (11th Cir. 1997)
    …ed to state law. In the medical profession, peer review is a “process by which physicians and hospitals evaluate and discipline staff doe-tors[.]” Bryan v. James E. Holmes Regional Medical Center, 33 F. 3d 1318, 1321 (11th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1019, 115 S.Ct. 1363, 131 L.Ed.2d 220 (1995). The “HCQIA grants limited immunity, in suits brought by disciplined physicians, from liability for money damages to those who participate in professional peer review activities.” Id. The HCQIA thus provide…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw