BEHRENS

v.

PELLETIER

Citator

Cited By

• Behrens v. Pelletier, 516 U.S. 299 (U.S. 1996)
  …ous. In an unpublished order, the Ninth Circuit dismissed the appeal “for lack of jurisdiction.” Pelletier v. Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco, No. 94-56507 (CA9, Nov. 17, 1994), reprinted in App. to Pet. for Cert. la. We granted certio-rari, 514 U. S. 1035 (1995). II Section 1291 of Title 28, U. S. C., gives courts of appeals jurisdiction over “all final decisions” of district courts, except those for which appeal is to be had to this Court. The requirement of finality precludes consideration of de…
• Libretti v. United States, 516 U.S. 29 (U.S. 1995)
  …ari to resolve disagreement among the Circuits as to the applicability of Rule 11(f) to asset forfeiture provisions contained in plea agreements2 and the requisites for waiver of the right to a jury determination of forfeitability under Rule 31(e).3 514 U. S. 1035 (1995). II Libretti insists that the District Court’s forfeiture order must be set aside (or at least modified), because the court neglected to establish a “factual basis” for forfeiture of the [*38] property covered by the order under Federal Rul…
• Citizens Bank of Md. v. Strumpf, 516 U.S. 16 (U.S. 1995)
  …violation of § 362(a). The Court of Appeals reversed. “[A]n administrative hold,” it said, “is tantamount to the exercise of a right of setoff and thus violates the automatic stay of § 362(a)(7).” 37 F. 3d 155, 158 (CA4 1994). We granted certiorari. 514 U. S. 1035 (1995). II The right of setoff (also called “offset”) allows entities that owe each other money to apply their mutual debts against each other, thereby avoiding “the absurdity of making A pay B when B owes A.” Studley v. Boylston Nat. Bank, 229 U.…