MARY LOU TURNER AND R. L. TURNER, APPELLANTS,
v.
ALVIN B. BACON, APPELLEE
MARY LOU TURNER AND R. L. TURNER, APPELLANTS,
ALVIN B. BACON, APPELLEE
101 Fla. 186
Florida Supreme Court (1931)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 133 So. 850
Cited by 47 cases
Opinion of the Court
This cause having heretofore -been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of-the Orders herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there are no errors in the said Orders ;• it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said Orders of the Circuit Court be, and the same are hereby'affirmed.
Buford, C.J., and Ellis and Brown, J.J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (13 total)
-
Auto Mut. Indem. Co. v. Shaw, 134 Fla. 815 (Fla. 1938)…rett, 346 Ill. 252, 178 N. E. 498, 81 A. L. R. 1262, and note; Wright v. Terry, 23 Fla. 160, a So. 6; Hunter v. Wilson, 21 Fla. 250; Enns-Halbe Co. v. Templeton, 101 Fla. 609, 135 So. 135; Johnson Electric Co. v. Columbia Casualty Co., 101 Fla. 186, 133 So. 850. [*824] See also Woodbury v. Tampa W. W. Co. 573 Fla. 248, 49 So. 556, 21 S. R. A. (W. S.) 1034. Upon the principle of law well established and long recognized, where a person engages another, for a valuable consideration, to do some act for a bene…
-
United States Gypsum Co. v. Columbia Cas. Co., 124 Fla. 633 (Fla. 1936)…tained was a school building for St. James Roman Catholic Parish at Orlando, Florida. Under the facts' alleged in plaintiff’s declaration, a cause of action against the surety company was made out. See: Johnson Electric Co. v. Columbia Casualty Co., 101 Fla. 186, 133 Sou. Rep. 850, 77 A. L. R. 1; Barry v. Columbia Casualty Co., 101 Fla. 168, 133 Sou. Rep. 852. So a final judgment in the surety company’s favor rendered on demurrer sustained to plaintiff’s declaration in this case was in due course of appella…
-
A.M. Crabtree, Jr. v. AETNA Cas. & Sur. Co., 438 So. 2d 102 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983)…rty to recover on a surety bond intended for his benefit as well as for the benefit of the formal parties thereto. See, e.g., American Surety Co. of New York v. Smith, 100 Fla. 1012, 130 So. 440 (1930); Johnson Electric Co. v. Columbia Casualty Co., 101 Fla. 186, 133 So. 850 (1931). But see Dekle v. Valrico Sandstone Co., 74 Fla. 346, 77 So. 95 (1917). A third party beneficiary’s right of action on the promise cannot, however, rise higher than the rights of the contracting party through whom he claims. 11 F…
Previewing 3 of 13 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence