LEE

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• State v. Owen, 696 So. 2d 715 (Fla. 1997)
  …inate interrogation. However, the reasoning of Davis applies when a defendant makes an equivocal [*718] assertion of any right under Miranda. This is well illustrated by the case of Coleman v. Singletary, 30 F. 3d 1420 (11th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1086, 115 S.Ct. 1801, 131 L.Ed.2d 727 (1995), in which the court considered the question of whether the defendant’s response to a police inquiry constituted an invocation of his right to remain silent. In upholding the admissibility of the confession bec…
• Smith v. State, 915 So. 2d 692 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005)
  …he discrimination of an Oxford don.’ ” (quoting Davis, 512 U.S. at 476, 114 S.Ct. at 2364, 129 L.Ed.2d at 382 (Souter, J., concurring in judgment))); Arnold, 421 F. 3d at 865; Coleman v. Singletary, 30 F. 3d 1420, 1424 (11th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1086, 115 S.Ct. 1801, 131 L.Ed.2d 727 (1995); Reid, 211 F. Supp. 2d at 374. Because we cannot find this error harmless beyond a reasonable doubt, a new trial is required on the charges to which the statements were pertinent. This excludes only the count…
• United States v. Courtnee Nicole Brantley, 803 F.3d 1265 (11th Cir. 2015)
  …ff questioning with sufficient clarity that a reasonable police officer in the circumstances would understand the statement to be an assertion of the right to remain silent.” Coleman v. Singletary, 30 F. 3d 1420, 1424 (11th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1086, 115 S.Ct. 1801, 131 L.Ed.2d 727 (1995). Brantley argues that, because reporting Morris’s crime (of possessing a firearm used to murder two police officers) would have revealed a crime she had committed (leaving the scene of a traffic stop), her pr…