DAVID LIPSCOMB UNIVERSITY

v.

STEELE ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Bennis v. Michigan, 516 U.S. 442 (U.S. 1996)
  …ioner of her interest in the forfeited car without due process, in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment, or has taken her interest for public use without compensation, in violation of the Fifth Amendment as incorporated by the Fourteenth Amendment. 515 U. S. 1121 (1995). We affirm. The gravamen of petitioner’s due process claim is not that she was denied notice or an opportunity to contest the abatement of her car; she was accorded both. Cf. United States v. James Daniel Good Real Property, 510 U. S. 43 (19…
• Bruce Lucero, M.D. v. Trosch, 121 F.3d 591 (11th Cir. 1997)
  …0-foot no approach residential zone in this ease is too broad. See Kirkeby v. Furness, 52 F. 3d 772, 774-75 (8th Cir.1995) (striking down 200-foot residential zone); Vittitow v. City of Upper Arlington, 43 F. 3d 1100, 1105 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 515 U.S. 1121, 115 S.Ct. 2276, 132 L.Ed.2d 280 (1995) (“Madsen ... makes clear that any linear extension beyond the area ‘solely in front of a particular residence’ is at best suspect if not prohibited outright.”). See also Douglas v. Brownell, 88 F. 3d 1511 (8t…

  ← 1 / 2 →