CANCEL

v.

CALIFORNIA

Citator

Cited By

• Chadwick Willacy v. State, 696 So. 2d 693 (Fla. 1997)
  …here was little reason to kill her except to eliminate her as a witness since she was his next door neighbor and could identify him easily and credibly both to police and in court. See Thompson v. State, 648 So. 2d 692, 695 (Fla.1994), cert, denied, 515 U.S. 1125, 115 S.Ct. 2283, 132 L.Ed.2d 286 (1995). The court applied the right rule of law to these facts,10 and competent substantial evidence supports its finding. We find no error. Willacy claims that the court improperly doubled the aggravating circumsta…
• Butler v. State, 842 So. 2d 817 (Fla. 2003)
  …years and has been repeatedly upheld by this Court — as recently as 1997. See Whitfield v. State, 706 So. 2d 1 (Fla.1997), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 840, 119 S.Ct. 103, 142 L.Ed.2d 82 (1998); Thompson v. State, 648 So. 2d 692 (Fla.1994), cert. denied, 515 U.S. 1125, 115 S.Ct. 2283, 132 L.Ed.2d 286 (1995); Brown v. State, 565 So. 2d 304 (Fla.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 992, 111 S.Ct. 537, 112 L.Ed.2d 547 (1990). The contention of the concurring and dissenting opinion is based in part on the statute being unc…
• Sneed v. State, 736 So. 2d 1274 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999)
  …al court’s application of the invited error doctrine in this instance, finding that the answer was responsive to the question asked. See Terry v. State, 668 So. 2d 954, 962 (Fla.1996); Thompson v. State, 648 So. 2d 692, 695 (Fla.1994), cert. denied, 515 U.S. 1125, 115 S.Ct. 2283, 132 L.Ed.2d 286 (1995). While the state attorney also improperly referred to the anonymous tip repeatedly in his closing argument, no objection was made. Defense counsel also referred to it in his closing and argued that the anonymi…