DOCTOR'S ASSOCIATES, INC., ET AL.
v.
CASAROTTO ET UX.

U.S. | 1995-06-12
No. 94-1518
515 U.S. 1129 Supreme Court of the United States (1995) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Doctor's Assocs., Inc. v. Casarotto et ux., 517 U.S. 681 (U.S. 1996)
    …DAI and Lombardi petitioned for certiorari. Last Term, we granted their petition, vacated the judgment of the Montana Supreme Court, and remanded for further consideration in light of Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos. v. Dobson, 513 U. S. 265 (1995). See 515 U. S. 1129 (1995). In Allied-Bruce, we restated what our decisions in Southland and Perry had established: [*686] “States may regulate contracts, including arbitration clauses, under general contract law principles and they may invalidate an arbitration clause…
  • Lawrence and next friend v. Chater, 516 U.S. 163 (U.S. 1996)
    …g., Exxon Corp. v. Youell, post, p. 801; Kapoor v. United States, post, p. 801; Edmond v. United States, post, p. 802; Pacesetter Constr. Co. v. Carpenters 16 Northern Cal. Ctys. Conference Bd., post, p. 802; Doctor’s Associates, Inc. v. Casarotto, 515 U. S. 1129 [*181] (1995); Calamia v. Singletary, 514 U. S. 1124 (1995). We regularly hold cases that involve the same issue as a case on which certiorari has been granted and plenary review is being conducted in order that (if appropriate) they may be “GVR’d…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw